Elsevier

Clinics in Dermatology

Volume 25, Issue 2, March–April 2007, Pages 203-211
Clinics in Dermatology

Cutaneous leishmaniasis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.05.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Cutaneous leishmaniasis is a widespread tropical infection caused by numerous different species of Leishmania protozoa that are transmitted by sandflies. Its clinical presentations are extremely diverse and dependent on a variety of parasite and host factors that are poorly understood. Diagnosis should aim to identify the exact species involved, but this requires laboratory investigations that are not widely available. No single ideal treatment has been identified, and those available are limited by variable success rates and toxicity. Clinical guidelines are needed to make better use of the investigations and treatments that do exist. Prevention is currently limited to bite prevention measures.

Introduction

Leishmaniasis is an infection caused by various species of Leishmania protozoa, which are usually transmitted by the bite of various species of phlebotomine sandflies. It occurs as a spectrum of clinical syndromes, which are usually divided into cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL), and visceral leishmaniasis (VL). The epidemiology and clinical features of the disease are highly variable due to the interplay of numerous factors in the parasites, vectors, hosts and environments involved. Laboratory diagnosis of cases can be difficult, especially when resources are limited or species identification is required. Good therapeutic trials require laboratory confirmation of cases, but this may reduce the numbers enrolled and result in trials that are underpowered. Different therapies have different efficacies against different Leishmania spp, and some are associated with significant toxicity. Hence, the optimum management of CL remains a specialist concern.

Section snippets

Epidemiology

Leishmaniasis is endemic in 88 countries throughout Latin America, Africa, Asia, and southern Europe (Fig. 1). Approximately 350 million people are thought to be at risk, with a worldwide prevalence of 12 million and an annual incidence of 1.5 million cases of CL. These figures are expected to rise because of global warming and changes in human ecology.1 Epidemics may occur when large numbers of nonimmune humans become exposed to infection for the first time, which may occur because of their

Etiology

There are 14 species of Leishmania that commonly cause human leishmaniasis, and the relationships between different species and clinical syndromes are usually simplified as shown in Table 1. For clinical reasons, it is important to differentiate New World species of the L (Leishmania) sub-genus (L mexicana complex) from those of the (L Viannia) sub-genus (L braziliensis complex); because species of the latter are associated with more severe and prolonged disease and also the risk of MCL

Pathology

The Leishmania life cycle begins when parasites in their promastigote form are inoculated by a sandfly bite into the skin of a mammalian host. Tissue macrophages phagocytose these Leishmania organisms, which turn into their amastigote form many will survive within the macrophages because of a variety of sophisticated defense mechanisms. The Leishmania parasites then multiply and spread to other macrophages dependent on various parasite and host factors. In CL, the infection is usually limited

Clinical features

Patients may not recall the initial sandfly bite that leads to CL, and so, a lack of reported bites should not be used to exclude the diagnosis. Incubation periods can vary from a few days to many months, and skin lesions may initially be ignored or misdiagnosed.

Acute CL usually presents as a small papule that enlarges and ulcerates at its center to produce a volcano-shaped “wet” lesion (Fig. 2). Ulcerated lesions are typical of infection due to Leishmania major and the New World species.

Differential diagnosis

Cutaneous leishmaniasis has a broad differential diagnosis because of its diverse clinical presentations.38 Most cases will present with a nonhealing skin ulcer, which is initially thought to be an infected insect bite or a true “tropical ulcer.” Less common bacterial causes include actinomycetoma, Buruli ulcer, ulceroglandular tularemia, and cutaneous anthrax, but these can usually be distinguished by their clinical features. Cutaneous tuberculosis, however, produces a variety of lesions and

Investigations

A clinical diagnosis of CL may be possible in endemic areas or where there is an obvious travel history. Laboratory confirmation, however, should be sought wherever possible because of the broad differential diagnosis and potentially toxic treatments that may be required. The investigations available have a wide range of reported sensitivities because of variations in the techniques used and because results are usually worse for older lesions. Good sampling technique39, 40 and close liaison

Treatment

The large number of reported treatments for CL indicates that no single ideal therapy has yet been identified. When reviewing therapeutic trials, it is important to note the natural history of the disease, the quality of trials with respect to the identification of parasites and significance of results, and also whether the reported findings are comparable with other trials or applicable in different settings.

With so many treatments available against CL, it is also not surprising that

Prevention

There is currently no chemoprophylaxis or immunoprophylaxis (vaccination) available to protect against CL, although prospects for a vaccine remain high.22, 80 Primary prevention relies on managed control of the maintenance host(s) and sandfly bite prevention measures. Although individual measures may not produce statistically significant protection, it is likely that a combination of measures will produce a cumulative protective effect.81 Secondary and tertiary prevention are dependent on the

Summary

Cutaneous leishmaniasis is now recognized as a complex and highly variable disease in terms of its epidemiology, etiology, pathology, and clinical features. Scientific advances have led to significant improvements in laboratory diagnosis, but currently available treatments are unsatisfactory. The development of better therapies and vaccines represent major challenges for the future.

References (81)

  • V. Pintado et al.

    HIV-associated visceral leishmaniasis

    Clin Microbiol Infect

    (2001)
  • Y. Dowlati

    Cutaneous leishmaniasis: clinical aspects

    Clin Dermatol

    (1996)
  • S. Teklemariam et al.

    Aminosidine and its combination with sodium stibogluconate in the treatment of diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania aethiopica

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg

    (1994)
  • M. Ben Said et al.

    Occurrence of Leishmania infantum cutaneous leishmaniasis in central Tunisia

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg

    (2006)
  • C. Ponce et al.

    Leishmania donovani chagasi: new clinical variant of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Honduras

    Lancet

    (1991)
  • A.J. Magill

    Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the returning traveler

    Infect Dis Clin North Am

    (2005)
  • B.L. Herwaldt

    Leishmaniasis

    Lancet

    (1999)
  • T. Laskay et al.

    Detection of cutaneous Leishmania infection in paraffin-embedded skin biopsies using the polymerase chain reaction

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg

    (1995)
  • N. Chargui et al.

    Usefulness of PCR in the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Tunisia

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg

    (2005)
  • R.X. Armijos et al.

    Comparison of the effectiveness of two topical paromomycin treatments versus meglumine antimoniate for New World cutaneous leishmaniasis

    Acta Trop

    (2004)
  • R.J. Willard et al.

    Cutaneous leishmaniasis in soldiers from Fort Campbell, Kentucky returning from Operation Iraqi Freedom highlights diagnostic and therapeutic options

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2005)
  • R.E. Saenz et al.

    Efficacy of ketoconazole against Leishmania braziliensis and panamensis cutaneous leishmaniasis

    Am J Med

    (1990)
  • S.D. Lawn et al.

    Electrocardiographic and biochemical adverse effects of sodium stibogluconate during treatment of cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis among returned travellers

    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg

    (2006)
  • J.J.H. Tuck et al.

    A malaria outbreak following a British military deployment to Sierra Leone

    J Infect

    (2003)
  • Bailey MS, Caddy AJ, McKinnon KA, et al. Zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis with local dissemination in Afghanistan. 2007...
  • G. Harms et al.

    Leishmaniasis in Germany

    Emerg Infect Dis

    (2003)
  • P.J. Weina et al.

    Old world leishmaniasis: an emerging infection among deployed US military and civilian workers

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • J.L. Sanchez et al.

    Epidemiologic investigation of an outbreak of cutaneous leishmaniasis in a defined geographic focus of transmission

    Am J Trop Med Hyg

    (1992)
  • R. Reithinger et al.

    Social impact of leishmaniasis, Afghanistan

    Emerg Infect Dis

    (2005)
  • R. Reithinger et al.

    Efficacy of thermotherapy to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania tropica in Kabul, Afghanistan: a randomized, control trial

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2005)
  • R. Kubba et al.

    Dissemination in cutaneous leishmaniasis. II. Satellite papules and subcutaneous induration

    Int J Dermatol

    (1988)
  • G.W. Wortmann et al.

    Cutaneous leishmaniasis following local trauma: a clinical pearl

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2000)
  • A.R. Al-Qurashi et al.

    Dissemination in cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania major in different ethnic groups in Saudi Arabia

    Int J Dermatol

    (2000)
  • M.L. Turetz et al.

    Disseminated leishmaniasis: a new and emerging form of leishmaniasis observed in northeastern Brazil

    J Infect Dis

    (2002)
  • C. Schraner et al.

    Successful treatment with miltefosine of disseminated cutaneous leishmaniasis in a severely immunocompromised patient infected with HIV-1

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2005)
  • F.T. Silveira et al.

    Clinical and immunopathological spectrum of American cutaneous leishmaniasis with special reference to the disease in Amazonian Brazil—a review

    Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz

    (2004)
  • S. Ahluwalia et al.

    Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis: an imported infection among travellers to central and South America

    BMJ

    (2004)
  • S.D. Lawn et al.

    New world mucosal and cutaneous leishmaniasis: an emerging health problem among British travellers

    QJM

    (2004)
  • P. Couppie et al.

    Comparative study of cutaneous leishmaniasis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected patients and non–HIV-infected patients in French Guiana

    Br J Dermatol

    (2004)
  • A.C. Motta et al.

    Disseminated mucocutaneous leishmaniasis resulting from chronic use of corticosteroid

    Int J Dermatol

    (2003)
  • Cited by (219)

    • Recent advancements in anti-leishmanial research: Synthetic strategies and structural activity relationships

      2021, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Leishmaniasis can be categorized clinically into cutaneous leishmaniasis, visceral multiorgan leishmaniasis (kala-azar), localized leishmaniasis (infection of the lymph node) and mucogenic leishmaniasis. Among these, the cutaneous type is most prevalent whereas the visceral type is associated with serious complications and may be life-threatening if not treated timely [3,30–36]. Leishmania is a digenetic protozoan parasite that requires two hosts to complete its lifecycle.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text