Invasive vulvar extramammary Paget's disease in the United States
Introduction
Extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) is a rare neoplasm arising from apocrine glands of the epidermis. Vulvar EMPD is the most common subtype. Despite its first description in the late 1800s, its pathogenesis and incidence remain poorly understood [1]. Most patients with vulvar EMPD have benign, intraepithelial disease, but invasive disease can occur as either primary invasive EMPD or in association with an adjacent adenocarcinoma. While reported rates of invasive EMPD vary widely (8–43%) [[2], [3], [4]], these cases represent only 1–6% of vulvar cancers in the United States [5,6]. Both invasive and non-invasive EMPD are rare, and there are no national guidelines to inform management. Standard treatment for intraepithelial and invasive EMPD is surgical excision, but topical therapy, laser ablation, systemic therapy, and radiation have been described. Because most outcome studies are small, retrospective series that include both invasive and non-invasive disease, it is unclear whether different treatment strategies are needed for patients with invasive vulvar EMPD [7].
The association between invasive EMPD and synchronous or subsequent malignancies is similarly poorly described. Reported rates of malignancies associated with or following vulvar EMPD vary from 11 to 54% [[8], [9], [10]],: however few patients with invasive disease are included in most series so the true rates for invasive cases is not evident [7]. The literature on management, prognosis, and development of second primary malignancies in patients with invasive EMPD is mostly limited to small, single institution case series or reviews.
Given limited existing data, survival following EMPD has not been adequately described. Cancer specific survival is excellent in patients with intraepithelial EMPD, but it is rarely reported for patients with invasive EMPD. There are no large clinical trials to inform prognosis of EMPD, but lower cancer specific survival is hypothesized for those with invasive disease [11].
Given the rarity of invasive EMPD, we utilized a national population-based tumor registry to better define the incidence, clinical management, association with underlying malignancy, and survival characteristics of invasive vulvar EMPD in a large cohort of patients.
Section snippets
Methods
The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database includes a set of population based registries covering approximately 34.6% of the United States [12]. Patients residing in the 21 registries available from 1992 on and diagnosed with invasive EMPD between 1992 and 2016 were identified by International Classification of Disease for Oncology version 3 (ICD-O3) histology code 8542 with associated vulvar topography codes C51.0–51.9. The year 1992 was
Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics (Table 1)
From 1992 to 2016, 1268 female patients were diagnosed with invasive vulvar EMPD (Table 1). The median age at diagnosis was 73 years (range, 29–100 years; SD, 12 years) and most patients were non-Hispanic white (n = 1043, 82.3%). Regarding disease distribution, 882 patients (69.6%) had localized disease, 152 patients (12.0%) had regional disease, 17 patients (1.3%) had distant disease, and 217 patients (17.1%) did not have staging information. Among all 1268 patients, surgery was the primary
Discussion
This study confirms the low incidence of invasive EMPD within the United States. Other than the studies published by Dorigo et al., the identification of prognostic variables, demographic variables, rates of synchronous and secondary malignancies in a United States cohort has historically been difficult to describe and limited to small institutional experiences, and this report provides an update of previous published studies [14,17]. Our study confirms a postmenopausal, non-Hispanic white
Author contributions
Drs. Kilts, Long, Bakkum-Gamez, Habermann, Cliby and Ms. Glasgow developed the original concept and study design. Ms. Glasgow performed data analyses. Drs. Kilts and Long generated the initial drafted manuscript; finally, all co-authors (Drs. Kilts, Long, Bakkum-Gamez, Habermann, Cliby and Ms. Glasgow) performed interpretation of the data, critically reviewed and edited the manuscript, and approved the final submitted version.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
References (23)
- et al.
Vulvar Paget disease of urothelial origin: a report of three cases and a proposed classification of vulvar Paget disease
Hum. Pathol.
(2002) - et al.
Paget’s disease of the vulva: a review of 89 cases
Gynecol. Oncol. Rep.
(2017) - et al.
Epidemiology and treatment of extramammary Paget disease in the Netherlands
Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.
(2007) - et al.
Vulvar Paget’s disease: the need to exclude an invasive lesion
Gynecol. Oncol.
(1990) - et al.
Penoscrotal extramammary Paget’s disease: the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center contemporary experience
J. Urol.
(2011) - et al.
Paget disease of the vulva
Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.
(2016) - et al.
Evidence-based screening recommendations for occult cancers in the setting of newly diagnosed extramammary Paget disease
Mayo Clin. Proc.
(2018) Analysis of relative survival and proportional mortality
Comput. Biomed. Res.
(1974)- et al.
Treatment outcomes in a large cohort of patients with invasive extramammary Paget’s disease
Gynecol. Oncol.
(2012) - et al.
Survival analysis of patients with invasive extramammary Paget disease: implications of anatomic sites
BMC Cancer
(2018)